.jpg) |
Father William Warthling |
In the fall of 1970 Father Warthling was hired as the first philosophy
professor at NCCC. He had previously taught at a Catholic high school while on
leave from his duties as a priest in the Buffalo Diocese. Father Warthling also taught part time at
Attica State Prison while he was teaching full time at NCCC.
Ordained into the Roman Catholic Church in 1963, by 1968
Father Warthling was actively serving the poor in an urban church in the
Buffalo Diocese. He also was active in the civil rights group “Build”, in which
the Catholic Church refused to participate. The Church hierarchy indicated that they had
their own ministries, but Father Warthling apparently thought such ministries
were inadequate.
Father Warthling challenged the Catholic hierarchy to become
more active in such civil rights issues that were ever present right here,
front and center in Western New York. There was plenty of blight and extreme
poverty in the city of Buffalo, and Father Warthling had been called to serve
the least among us. The Buffalo Diocese responded by attempting to transfer Father Warthling to a parish away from the urban setting that he so
passionately served. Twice the hierarchy
attempted, and twice Father Warthling refused to comply. By 1970 Father Warthling had resigned from
active ministry, meaning that he could no longer serve communion or hear
confession.
Father William Warthling was my philosophy professor in the
spring of 1979. It was my second year at
NCCC, I was 20 years old, and I was quite confident that I knew just about
everything - or at least just about everything that was important to know. Having survived a few college-level science
courses, having read part of an Isaac Asimov book, and having looked at a lot
of pictures in Scientific American, I suppose that I had a certain smug
superiority that comes with a bit of scientific education in one’s youth.
My first impression of the Father was that he was somewhat
of an anathema. He referred to the resurrection as the “Jesus myth”, while
mentioning that this was a philosophical term, and not necessarily what he
believed. Father Warthling also referred
to his priestly garb as his “Jesus suit”, which he always wore to Attica State Prison. There was, of course, a certain honesty about him. The Father was
certainly not afraid to speak his mind.
Although the historical record has him confronting the
Church hierarchy, Father Warthling was far from confrontational with his
students. I remember him as being quite amicable. Class time was usually spent with Father
Warthling introducing some topic, followed by some class discussion. He was
always quite animated about what we were talking about. The eminent Catholic
writer, G.K. Chesterton, once criticized 20th century thinkers for being
interested in everything but everything.
Father Warthling was interested in everything and everything. His curiosity was infectious. In the world of
ideas, Father Warthling was like a kid in a candy shop. He apparently never lost his youthful curiosity.
Sometime around mid-semester, Father Warthing spent a class
or two discussing cosmology. He was
quite perplexed at why some cosmologists could believe that the universe could
be forever expanding. This was a
question of theological importance that had sprung up with the dawn of modern
physics in the early 20th century. An ever-expanding universe
pointed toward a definite beginning, which is why the big-bang was initially
unpalatable among some (but not all) scientists. I took the time to write him a
“reaction paper”, showing how this could be physically and mathematically
possible. Several years after in 1983 Father
Warthling took a sabbatical to further his study of such things. He is listed as being a senior fellow in the Martin Marty Center for the Advanced Study of Religion, where he studied "Post-Modern Science and Theology." He later
related to me that he learned, or attempted to learn a lot of math during his
sabbatical.
At the end of the semester we did have a final exam, which
seemed quite trivial. I think we had to
write something about Plato and Aristotle. He may have even told us what was on
the exam. At the time I figured he gave us an exam just to say he did so,
possibly to satisfy some departmental requirement. In retrospect, I suppose the wise professor
knew that something much more important was going on than the mere
regurgitation of facts on a written exam.
As a fitting tribute to Father Warthling, below is what I
learned in class, and what I learned after his class.
Things I remember learning from Father Warthling:
1) Plato was
an idealist, and Aristotle wasn’t.
2) Cosmology
and metaphysics are interesting.
Cosmology is an interesting interface between science and everything.
3) David
Hume and some of the English faculty at NCCC were “empiricist pigs”.
4) Father Warthling
was not a pig.
5) People in
Egypt don’t eat peanut butter because it looks like camel dung.
6) Plato wrote
an allegory about a man in a cave.
Some (but
not all) of the philosophers I read/read about subsequent to Father Warthling’s
class:
1) St.
Thomas – read G.K. Chesterton’s book instead of wading through the Summa.
2) St.
Augustine – Never made it through City of God. I was more interested in his influence on
Martin Luther. An interesting quote: “Nothing is too absurd to have been said
by a mathematician.”
3) Blaise
Pascal – A devoted Catholic who anonymously wrote The Provincial Letters,
which was an attack on abuses in the Church.
I am sure Father Warthling liked Pascal.
An interesting quote: “Nothing is too absurd to have been said by a
philosopher.”
4) David
Hume – I had to find out more about the empiricist pigs. I concluded that
empiricism, and my sophomoric version of logical positivism was more of a mood
than a tenable philosophy. Empiricism, if followed to its logical conclusion, collapses into solipsism. One cannot even prove empirically that one's memory is valid.
5) Carl
Sagan – Technically not a philosopher, but many look to him for their complete
world view. Notre Dame philosophy professor, Fr. Ernan McMullen, used
to point out the numerous historical mistakes Sagan made. Fr. Stanley Jaki also pointed out numerous mistakes Sagan made. Carl Sagan wrote history the way he thought it should have happened.
6) Carl
Hempel, Carl Popper and Father Stanley Jaki – Father Jaki makes the case that
the realist metaphysics of St. Thomas laid the proper foundation for the birth
of modern science several hundred years hence. I read six of his books. Father
Jaki had a Ph.D. in physics and a Ph.D. in theology. Science does rest upon
metaphysics, logically as well as historically. Popper deconstructs the notion of a proven
scientific theory, but heaves us hanging.
Hempel tries to save science as an autonomous enterprise, but fails.
7) G. K.
Chesterton, George Bernard Shaw and H. G. Wells – Ferocious debaters in the
early 20th century, and good friends off the court. Refreshingly
honest. I still read Chesterton, and
watch the G. K. Chesterton show on EWTN.
8) Bertrand
Russell – a very vocal skeptic and materialist who was as interesting as dirt. His skepticism at one time collapsed into
solipsism. Most of his later thought seems quite arbitrary.
9) Bertrand
Russell and Gottlieb Frege – Analytic philosophers I discovered through
foundations of math. I can’t imagine
reading Russell and Whitehead’s Principia Mathematica.
10) C. E. M.
Joad – British skeptic who converted to Christianity at age 52. Joad
was very good at simplifying philosophical ideas for the man on the
street. He has some very straight
forward ideas on ethics and theism.
11) Moritz
Schlick, Adolf Carnap, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Albert Einstein and the Vienna
Circle – I learned the most about Einstein by spending about one hour reading
‘Cosmic Religion”, which was a collection of Einstein’s short essays. I purchased this book at a garage sale I stopped at while
riding my bike. Although a nominal Jew, Einstein was accused by his positivist
friends of being a Catholic. Einstein
considered himself a meta-physicist, more so than a physicist.
12) C. S.
Lewis – Lost one debate in his whole life.
Debated weekly at Oxford with the Socratic club he founded.
13) Alvin
Plantinga – He rejects St. Thomas’ foundationalism, and developed what he calls
“reformed epistemology.” Plantinga is a Calvinist who teaches at Notre
Dame. He tackled the problem of evil,
and other objections to theistic belief.
Plantinga claims that theistic believe is “properly basic” in his work God
and Other Minds.
14) Richard
Dawkins – I didn’t spend very long before I realized this was a new permutation
of an old set of ideas. He is stuck in
the sophomoric, positivist rut I was in at age 20. He really rehashes a lot of old ideas, packaged
in a shiny new book with a lot of science mixed in to give an air of
respectability. I’ll bet he became rich
off of his books. Largely the same
shtick as Carl Sagan.
It has been twenty some years since Father Warthling's death at an early age. Fortunately I had the pleasure of being his colleague for a short time. On more than one occasion students were overheard walking the halls, or in line in the cafeteria, talking about the latest adventure into the world of Father Warthling.
Here is a link to a repository of old newspapers. There is plenty of information about Father Warthling's plight, but you have to search for it:
http://fultonhistory.com/Fulton.html
Part II coming soon.......